Skip to content
  • About
  • Accolades
  • Practices
    • China Desk
    • Construction & Engineering
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment & Industrial Relations
    • India Desk
    • Insurance
    • International Arbitration
    • Maritime & Shipping
    • Medical Negligence
    • Private Client Disputes & Advisory
    • Probate, Wills & Estate
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Restructuring & Insolvency
    • Vietnam Desk
    • White Collar Crime
    View all
    China Desk
    Construction & Engineering
    Corporate & Commercial
    Dispute Resolution
    Employment & Industrial Relations
    India Desk
    Insurance
    International Arbitration
    Maritime & Shipping
    Medical Negligence
    Private Client Disputes & Advisory
    Probate, Wills & Estate
    Real Estate & Construction
    Restructuring & Insolvency
    Vietnam Desk
    White Collar Crime
  • People
  • Careers
  • Insights
  • Countries
    Offices
    • Singapore
    • Thailand
    • Malaysia
    • Australia
    Regional Desks
    • China
    • India
    • Vietnam
Enquiries
Download Full CV

Royce Bong

  • Senior Associate
  • Advocate & Solicitor (High Court of Malaya)

Royce is a Senior Associate in the dispute resolution team with a focus on complex litigation and arbitration.

He has represented clients in a wide spectrum of high-value and complex contentious and non-contentious matters spanning construction, maritime and shipping, civil and commercial, fraud, and asset recovery.

Royce frequently appears as counsel and co-counsel across all levels of the Malaysian Courts and has extensive experience in both domestic and international arbitrations under leading institutional rules including the ICC, AIAC, PAM and SIAC.

Royce graduated from University London with an LL.B. (Hons) in 2018, obtained his Certificate in Legal Practice in 2019, and was called to the Malaysian Bar in 2021.

Fluent in English, Malay, Mandarin, and Cantonese, Royce is able to engage effectively with a broad range of clients and stakeholders across multiple jurisdictions.

Read more

Contact

  • +603 2731 9270
  • roycebong@tsl-legal.com

Key Practices

Qualifications
  • Advocate and Solicitor, High Court of Malaya
  • University of London, LL.B (Hons)
  • Certificate in Legal Practice
Speaking engagements
Memberships
  • Member, Malaysian Bar

Selected Experience

Selected Experience

  • Acted for the owners of the Oriental Dragon vessel in proceedings against Asia Capital Commodities Trade Sdn Bhd in Worldport v ACC. Successfully obtained leave from the Federal Court to appeal on several novel and complex questions of law concerning admiralty jurisdiction in Malaysia in relation to a financial claim arising from alleged casino-related liabilities.
  • Successfully represented an Australian tourism company in a breach of contract claim worth AU$ 2,000,000 against a Malaysian vessel builder, as reported in LA Leisure Pty Ltd (mendakwa sebagai Pemegang Amanah kepada LAT Unit Trust) v Sabrecraft Marine Sdn Bhd & Ors [2025] MLJU 51.
  • • Acted for a Singaporean palm oil exporter against an application to set aside and suspend a US$ 17,000,000 PORAM arbitral award rendered in its favour.
  • • Represented a Hong Kong-based vessel owner against claims of approximately RM 8,000,000 brought against its Vessel in a writ in rem action.
  • Represented a Spanish recycling company in an AIAC arbitration proceedings concerning disputes involving outstanding payments.
  • Represented a public-listed construction company in a dispute against a dissolved Korean subcontractor arising out of the construction of a hospital project in West Malaysia, valued at over RM 160,000,000.
  • Represented a timber extraction company against an application to set aside an arbitral award worth over RM 200,000,000 rendered in its favour.
  • Represented a timber extraction company against an application to set aside an arbitral award worth over RM 200,000,000 rendered in its favour.
  • Represented a public-listed construction company in a dispute against the public authorities over breach of contract in respect of construction of houses under the 1Malaysia Civil Servants Housing Programme worth over RM 456,000,000.
  • Represented multiple developers in construction adjudication proceedings as well as the ensuing court proceedings to enforce, stay and set aside the adjudication decision pending disposal of arbitration, for example in High Rise Millennium Sdn Bhd v Pelangi Hartajaya Sdn Bhd and another case [2022] MLJU 1672 and Charter Built Construction Sdn Bhd v Amalan Setar (M) Sdn Bhd and another case [2024] MLJU 1002.
  • Represented a television programme producer and broadcaster in an action against a digital terrestrial television service provider in a breach of contract dispute worth over RM 700,000,000.
  • Assisted the Malaysian Bar in its application for judicial review challenging the Attorney General’s decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against Dato’ Seri Zahid Hamidi.
  • Successfully represented a high-profile individual in obtaining a restraining order against a suspected arson offender.
  • Defended a hypermarket against a claim by the Royal Malaysia Customs Department against a charge for alleged evasion of duty.
  • Successfully represented a celebrated lieutenant general in remand proceedings.
  • Assisted in defending a major cryptocurrency exchange in a user’s claim for forfeited profits arising from market manipulation.
  • Assisted a Singapore construction company in pursuing claims against its employer for unpaid work done amounting to SG$ 8,000,000.
  • Advised a port operator on potential legal actions against an international container and logistics service provider for damages suffered arising from a fire caused by the cargo in one of the service provider’s container. Disputes would be referred to arbitration under the AIAC Arbitration Rules 2023.
  • Advised an American financial institution on potential legal actions to recover over RM 44,000,000 worth of physical assets destroyed by fire at a security company’s premises. Disputes would be referred to arbitration under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2021.
  • Advised a leading Takaful operator in Malaysia on potential legal actions against one of the country’s biggest Islamic bank over breaches of the Bancatakaful Agreement.
  • Advised a container terminal on potential legal actions against one of the world’s largest container shipping company for breaches of a lease.
  • Advised a Singapore-based Public Relations Company on potential legal actions against a Labuan-based cryptocurrency broker over breaches of a Service Agreement.
  • Advised a global energy and marine solutions provider regarding its potential exposure and chances in arbitration concerning the construction of an offshore oil rig under an EPCIC Contract.
  • Advised a developer on setting aside an adjudication decision over disputes arising from the construction of a contact lens manufacturing facility.
More

Publications

Latest Contributions

  • Legal Update
  • | 8 November 2025

The Arbitration (Amendment) Bill 2024 And CIPAA (Amendment) Bill 2024: Reshaping Malaysia's ADR Landscape

  • Legal Update
  • | 24 October 2025

What Happens When You Obtain An Adjudication Decision Under CIPAA 2012 (Part 2)

Address

Tan, Siew & Lee (TSL Legal) 
9-1, Level 9,
Wisma UOA Damansara II,
No. 6, Jalan Changkat Semantan,
Damansara Heights,
50490 Kuala Lumpur

Contact
Tel : +603 3009 7825
Email : enquiries@tsl-legal.com
Countries
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • Australia
Regional Desks
  • China
  • India
  • Vietnam

Tan, Siew & Lee (“TSL Legal”) is a partnership incorporated under the laws of Malaysia. © All rights reserved 2026.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Malaysian Bar
Cookies on our website

We use cookies on our site to remember you, show you content we think you will like and help you to use this site. For more details, please see our cookies policy.

Click ‘Accept’ to consent to cookies other than strictly necessary cookies or ‘Reject’ if you do not. You can change your mind at any time by visiting our cookie policy page.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • About
  • Accolades
  • Practices
    • China Desk
    • Construction & Engineering
    • Corporate & Commercial
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment & Industrial Relations
    • India Desk
    • Insurance
    • International Arbitration
    • Maritime & Shipping
    • Medical Negligence
    • Private Client Disputes & Advisory
    • Probate, Wills & Estate
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Restructuring & Insolvency
    • Vietnam Desk
    • White Collar Crime
    View all
  • People
  • Careers
  • Insights
  • Countries
    Offices
    • Singapore
    • Thailand
    • Malaysia
    • Australia
    Regional Desks
    • China
    • India
    • Vietnam
Enquiries